On 1/26/12 5:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:23 AM, justin wrote:
>> We (members of the sci team) agreed to stick to the new versioning so we
>> need a "pseudo-downgrade".
>> For your help:
>>
>> echo ">=sci-libs/arpack-96" >> /etc/portage/package.mask
>
> Wouldn't this be
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:23 AM, justin wrote:
> We (members of the sci team) agreed to stick to the new versioning so we
> need a "pseudo-downgrade".
> For your help:
>
> echo ">=sci-libs/arpack-96" >> /etc/portage/package.mask
Wouldn't this be better-suited to a news item combined with a mask
Hi,
This is addressed to a all sci-libs/arpack ~arch consumers.
Please test version 3.0.2. It is basically version 96-r2, but from a new
upstream. The old is dead for some time, resulting in several downstream
patches. The scilab team has now picked up the maintenance and the
patches. But they cha
