On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:01:07AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> The dependencies on module-init-tools in the tree should be changed to
> virtual/modutils. I am willing to do this myself if no one objects. If I
> do, should I open individual bugs for the packages?
As kernel-misc, I've fixed them al
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 1:01 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> If not, once the dependencies are correct, I propose
> dropping virtual/modutils from the system set.
If we drop it from the system set, the kernel modules section of the
handbook should be updated.
All,
in preparation to unmask udev-181, it was brought to my attention that a
number of packages in the tree have direct dependencies on
module-init-tools. Udev-181 requires kmod, which is a replacement for
module-init-tools.
I have added virtual/modutils to the tree which as of now prefers
modul
