William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I saw that we have a request for an ebuild for upstart.
I had requests for other highly experimental yet to be tested programs...
>
> I think this would be an intresting idea, and I'm curious what others on
> this list would think about it.
As long as it won't
On Friday 16 February 2007, William Hubbs wrote:
> I saw that we have a request for an ebuild for upstart.
>
> I am looking it over and looking at the sample jobs that can be
> downloaded from the site.
>
> I think this would be an intresting idea, and I'm curious what others on
> this list would t
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:40:03 -0700
"Daniel Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and a bit of history - at one point, I used djb's supervise as
> part of the initscripts so that we could do stuff similarly to
> upstart. When the initscripts were rewritten, we went to bash and had
> the intenti
Oh, and a bit of history - at one point, I used djb's supervise as
part of the initscripts so that we could do stuff similarly to
upstart. When the initscripts were rewritten, we went to bash and had
the intention of adding process monitoring and restart eventually -
but gentoo was growing so fast
I don't see any reason why not to add it. It would certainly make it
easier to play around with.
On 2/16/07, William Hubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I saw that we have a request for an ebuild for upstart.
I am looking it over and looking at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
I saw that we have a request for an ebuild for upstart.
I am looking it over and looking at the sample jobs that can be
downloaded from the site.
I think this would be an intresting idea, and I'm curious what others on
this list would think a
