Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 03:40, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 05-07-2011 03:00:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:56:25 Fabian Groffen wrote: >> > Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified >> > version of baselayout-1. >> >> why ? > > I haven't tried

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 05-07-2011 03:00:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:56:25 Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified > > version of baselayout-1. > > why ? Because original baselayout-1 doesn't compile, and we don't need all it prov

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 04, 2011 13:56:25 Fabian Groffen wrote: > Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified > version of baselayout-1. why ? -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-07-2011 16:23:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified > > version of baselayout-1. If your virtual is going to make it possible > > to have no openrc, or some open

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-04 Thread William Hubbs
Hi Fabian, On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:56:25PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Just one little note, which is that Prefix is stuck with a modified > version of baselayout-1. If your virtual is going to make it possible > to have no openrc, or some openrc-light, then that would certainly > improve t

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-07-2011 09:30:17 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > My goal with this virtual, once it is in the tree and keyworded > everywhere, is to add it to profiles/base/packages so that it will be > part of the system set. Then we could remove the PDEPEND from baselayout > and we would still be assured tha

[gentoo-dev] rfc: new virtual for initscripts function

2011-07-04 Thread William Hubbs
All, Can you please take a look at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=373843? Currently, sys-apps/openrc is installed on all gentoo systems due to the following line in sys-apps/baselayout: PDEPEND="sys-apps/openrc" My goal with this virtual, once it is in the tree and keyworded everywhere