El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 08:44 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/09/12 06:23 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, William Hubbs
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I can agree that a server would probably want a static
> >> c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/09/12 06:23 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, William Hubbs
> wrote:
>>
>> I can agree that a server would probably want a static
>> configuration, but all work stations do not use gnome, kde, etc.
>>
>
> Most do no
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> I can agree that a server would probably want a static configuration,
> but all work stations do not use gnome, kde, etc.
>
Most do not run unix, but at work I can't think of any servers that
are using static configurations. They might be
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:43:08PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:01 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > On 9/10/12 11:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:01 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 9/10/12 11:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> >>> In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, whi
On 9/10/12 11:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/09/12 04:05 PM, David Leverton wrote:
> 4) dhcpcd: not sure when it was introduced, but current dhcpcd can
> detect when the link goes up and down, and request/renew its lease
> when it comes up. The only wrinkle that I can see here is that,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 02:47:48PM -0700, Christopher Head wrote:
> As a user… yes? I use a laptop, so I don’t much care which one is
> maintained but I’d be quite annoyed if both went away (unless there’s
> some other dæmon that does the same job that I’ve never heard of).
I am thinking that we w
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:48:32 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> Does anyone have any thoughts about whether we should keep OpenRC
> support for one or both of these?
As a user… yes? I use a laptop, so I don’t much care which one is
maintained but I’d be quite annoyed if both went away (unless there’s
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:26:10PM -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
> > the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has
> > declared netplugd to be obs
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 09:48 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
> the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has
> declared netplugd to be obsolete in favor of ifplugd.
>
> Does anyone have any thoughts about whe
On 10 September 2012 15:48, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I have a regression in OpenRc wrt netplugd [1].
>
> In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
> the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has
> declared netplugd to be obsolete in favor o
All,
I have a regression in OpenRc wrt netplugd [1].
In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has
declared netplugd to be obsolete in favor of ifplugd.
Does anyone have any thoughts about whether we sho
13 matches
Mail list logo
