On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:20:33PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 03:49 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:28:44PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Here is where my thoughts are on this now. There will be a
> > "-containers" keyword, which will expand to list all of th
On 12/02/2015 03:49 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:28:44PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> Here is where my thoughts are on this now. There will be a
> "-containers" keyword, which will expand to list all of the containers
> we can detect on the operating system OpenRC is runn
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 03:28:44PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:21:49AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 12/01/2015 10:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:26:19AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Med
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:21:49AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 10:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:26:19AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> >>> On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> Th
On 12/01/2015 10:19 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:26:19AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
>>> On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
The "container" keyword, being generic, would have its meaning expanded
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:26:19AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > The "container" keyword, being generic, would have its meaning expanded
> > > to cover new container systems as they co
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:00:55AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > The "container" keyword, being generic, would have its meaning expanded
> > to cover new container systems as they come along. This means if a
> > service script has the keyword "-containe
On 12/01/2015 08:50 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> The "container" keyword, being generic, would have its meaning expanded
> to cover new container systems as they come along. This means if a
> service script has the keyword "-container" it will not work under any
> current or future container systems.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:11:45AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:24:05AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > Rather than replacing all of the system-specific keywords, can we make
> > 'container' into an alias that expands to the full list of known container
> > types? Tha
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 12:24:05AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> A quick grep in the tree shows the following existing cases (wrapped for line
> length).
>
> $ git grep -E \
> 'keyword .*(lxc|systemd-nspawn|vserver|prefix|openvz|uml|jail|xen)'
> sys-apps/kmod/files/kmod-static-nodes-r1:
>
A quick grep in the tree shows the following existing cases (wrapped for line
length).
$ git grep -E \
'keyword .*(lxc|systemd-nspawn|vserver|prefix|openvz|uml|jail|xen)'
sys-apps/kmod/files/kmod-static-nodes-r1:
keyword -lxc -systemd-nspawn
sys-fs/eudev/files/udev-postmount:
keywo
All,
it has been proposed to me that we create a "container" keyword for
OpenRC init scripts, which would take the place of the various keywords
we have currently for separate container types, such as lxc,
systemd-nspawn, etc (basically the values RC_SYS can be set to).
We would keep all of the cu
12 matches
Mail list logo
