On 09/06/2014 08:41, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014 12:34:11 William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
>> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
>> become just adding iproute2.
>
> I
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>
> I'm not sure we can get rid of python2 and have only python3, but if that's
> possible, absolutely punt it! The bloat I'm talking about includes size,
> but more importantly, I'm concerned about cpu time. When building on a minor
> arch
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> And by the same reasoning of "bloat" we should remove openssh ( and maybe even
> rsync ;) ) because it's not strictly needed - so maybe we want a "minimal" and
> a "useful" stage3 ?
I could care less what is in the stage3, which only affect
On 09/06/14 08:41, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Friday 05 September 2014 12:34:11 William Hubbs wrote:
All,
there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
become just adding iproute2.
I wouldn't mind eithe
On Friday 05 September 2014 12:34:11 William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
> become just adding iproute2.
I wouldn't mind either option - net-tools has been dep
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Even better, @system is basically stuff you don't want to depend
> explicitly on or on which it is hard to depend on. As I see it, it
> should be just the most basic stuff, like baselayout, shell, some basic
> POSIX-defined utilities, some rand
On 09/05/14 17:20, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 16:30:43
"Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a):
On 09/05/14 16:08, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11
William Hubbs napisał(a):
there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
system set [1]. Or
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 16:30:43
"Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a):
> On 09/05/14 16:08, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11
> > William Hubbs napisał(a):
> >
> >> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
> >> system set [1]. Originally the request
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> I don't like to say no when people want something, but I think here I'm with
> Michal. My idea of @system is that it must be the bare minimum to have a
> "working" system. And for a working system you need just enough toolchain,
> netwo
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 09/05/14 16:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11
>> William Hubbs napisał(a):
>>
>>> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
>>> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop
On 09/05/14 16:08, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11
William Hubbs napisał(a):
there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
become just adding iproute2.
If no one objects, I wou
Dnia 2014-09-05, o godz. 12:34:11
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
> become just adding iproute2.
>
> If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in t
05.09.14 21:21, Wyatt Epp написав(ла):
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
>>
>> no, because it's not necessary to bring up a working system. we don't
>> have wpa_supplicant, and we shouldn't have net-tools now that openrc
>> isn't in @system anymore.
>>
> Well, your definition of "wo
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
>
> no, because it's not necessary to bring up a working system. we don't
> have wpa_supplicant, and we shouldn't have net-tools now that openrc
> isn't in @system anymore.
>
Well, your definition of "working" seems quite a bit narrower than mine!
Mo
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 05/09/14 01:34 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
>> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
>> become just adding iproute2.
>>
>> If no one
On 05/09/14 01:34 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
> system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
> become just adding iproute2.
>
> If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in the next 7
All,
there is a bug open requesting that we add sys-apps/iproute2 to the
system set [1]. Originally the request was to drop net-tools, but it has
become just adding iproute2.
If no one objects, I would like to do this sometime in the next 72
hours by adding sys-apps/iproute2 to profiles/default/l
17 matches
Mail list logo
