Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman not complaining when going straight to stable

2011-11-29 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/29/2011 04:11 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 11/26/11 11:29 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: >> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:15:53 +0100 >> ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: >> >>> This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only >>> ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and r

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman not complaining when going straight to stable

2011-11-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/26/11 11:29 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:15:53 +0100 > ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > >> This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only >> ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and repoman doesn't complain. > > It would need to fetch late

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman not complaining when going straight to stable

2011-11-26 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:15:53 +0100 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote: > This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only > ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and repoman doesn't complain. It would need to fetch latest CVS file from server to check against previous state. I

[gentoo-dev] repoman not complaining when going straight to stable

2011-11-26 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and repoman doesn't complain. $ ekeyword x86 netboot-0.10.2.ebuild netboot-0.10.2.ebuild --- netboot-0.10.2.ebuild 2011-11-23 02:41:03.0 +0100 +++ netboot-0.10.2.ebuild.new