On 12/08/2016 06:10 AM, Doug Freed wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
>>> names for USE flags enabling freerdp support: r
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Doug Freed wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
>>> names for USE flags enabling freerdp s
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
>> names for USE flags enabling freerdp support: rdp, rdesktop and freerdp
>>
>> rdesktop is the on
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:29:51 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
> names for USE flags enabling freerdp support: rdp, rdesktop and freerdp
>
> rdesktop is the only one that is a global USE flag, even if it's used only by
> two
When looking at freerdp reverse deps I noticed we are using three different
names for USE flags enabling freerdp support: rdp, rdesktop and freerdp
rdesktop is the only one that is a global USE flag, even if it's used only by
two packages, the others are local USE flags that are enabling similar
s