On 09-06-2011 21:39:43 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
> it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
Perhaps you can generalise the discussion into when you do consider a
changelog entry to (still) be relevant
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:39:43 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
> it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
>
> Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each
> subdirectory? Some subdir
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
> it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
>
> Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each
> subdirectory? Some subdirecto
y use the contact forms located there to send us your
question.
Original Message Follows:
From: Ulrich Mueller
Subject: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:39:43 +0200
The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/09/2011 08:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
> it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
>
> Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files
The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each
subdirectory? Some subdirectories already have such a file, but it
looks to me like they've b
