Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530 > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner >> wrote: >> > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd >> > zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p >> >> Wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:06:09 Markos Chandras wrote: > Hello folks, > > Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration > manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] > there is a dual(?) license. > There is the standard commercial license[

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > I quote: > > In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used when > saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall instead be the name on the right of the > arrow. When consulting mirrors (except for those explicitly listed on > the left of

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner > wrote: > > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd > > zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p > > Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o Uhm. We did. PMS i

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-22 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd > > zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p > > Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o > > The mirror-dist script *cann

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd zac > as he maintains mirror-dist ;p > Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o The mirror-dist script *cannot* rename the upstream files for storage, since emerge will

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh >> >> wrote: >> > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 >> > >> > Markos Chandras wrote: >> >> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications b

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:41:39 Alec Warner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh > > wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 > > > > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors > >> behave with arrows. > > > > It's

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 > Markos Chandras wrote: >> I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors >> behave with arrows. > > It's supposed to say this: > >> In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used,

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Markos Chandras wrote: > Sebastian, > Why would I want to do that? The license files should stay untouched. > There is > nothing wrong of having both licenses on ebuild since this is the upstream > policy. I forgot that the license files upstream might change so I agree you need a cop

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 15:46:19 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Markos Chandras wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration > > manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] > > there is a dual(?) license. > > Ther

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:39:43 +0200 Markos Chandras wrote: > I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but couldn't find how mirrors > behave with arrows. It's supposed to say this: > In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used > when saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall instead be the

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Markos Chandras wrote: > Hello folks, > > Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration > manager. > My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] there is a > dual(?) license. > There is the standard commercial license[4] and one for free software

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:50:08 Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Saturday 21 March 2009, Markos Chandras wrote: > > Doing some research I found out that perforce-cli was in the portage > > back in 2006 but not anymore. Can somebody recall the reason why it > > is not there anymore? If it wasn't a

Re: [gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Saturday 21 March 2009, Markos Chandras wrote: > Doing some research I found out that perforce-cli was in the portage > back in 2006 but not anymore. Can somebody recall the reason why it > is not there anymore? If it wasn't a license issue , I want to bring > it back ( at least the client

[gentoo-dev] perforce client proper license

2009-03-21 Thread Markos Chandras
Hello folks, Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3] there is a dual(?) license. There is the standard commercial license[4] and one for free software development[4]. Should I add both?