Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> My quote was from the first sentence of RFC1738, sec 3.3 (HTTP), para 4.
Missed that, sorry.
>> Redirecting clients to new URLs would give you perfect caching as well.
> That's why I say i'm willing to do redirection at the cache level.
> I do NOT want lots of users with
> Now that's something that sound reasonable. Why limit the period and
> don't provide it forever?
To comment slightly here:
Forever and Unlimited are always just dirty lies. Don't make promises
you can't keep.
To be fair even some of Robin's comments are odd, mentioning
'permanent urls'. Sure
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:11:31AM +0100, Jan Kundr?t wrote:
> > - See also RFC1738: 'Within the and components, "/",
> > ";", "?" are reserved.'
> My copy of RFC1738 says (end of section 2.2):
...
> I wasn't able to find your quote in that file.
My quote was from the first sentence of RFC1738,
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> - Using the ';' as an argument separator in the old side is not a valid
> query argument separator, and there are URLs out there that have added
> further arguments using it, complicating parsing.
What is source of your definition of "valid query argument separator"?
> On the subject of Squid, it would be extremely useful if it could
> ignore some headers and respect others in figuring out if the page is
> already in the cache, without stripping the headers from the request
> (it is doable with Apache's mod_cache), so that two requests with only
> a slightly d
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:20:11AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
> > the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
> > '/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode
On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
> the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
> '/packages/?category=media-sound;name=mp3unicode'
> (The new form is '/package/media-sound/mp3unicode').
why ? you've
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:22 -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
>
>> (Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
>>
>
> Let me take this opportunity to remind people to set a reply-to when
> sending anything to gentoo-dev-announce so people replying will reply to
> the
Doug Klima wrote:
> Robin's e-mail did set the Reply-To. Joe just broke the world.. bad Joe!
Yeah, even reply-to is no match for the mighty "reply all" button! :)
Giving myself 50 lashes now...
-Joe
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:22 -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
> (Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
Let me take this opportunity to remind people to set a reply-to when
sending anything to gentoo-dev-announce so people replying will reply to
the proper place.
Thanks,
--
Chris Gianelloni
R
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I've been
> asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo
> without the spotlight effect on the background.
What about http://www.gentoo.org/images/gentoo-logo.svg ? It's just the
G, without any attached background or halo effect. Convert it to a png
o
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Bruno wrote:
> E.g when looking at categories only the first 'n' items are show and there is
> no mention on the total count.
> At a minimum it should display something like:
>showing packages 1-29 out of 127
> on page bottom with note that page browsi
(Sorry for the previous reply to announce..)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
Great! Glad to see it back; thanks for the hard work! And hey, fbsd is
now considered "exotic"! I kinda like the ring
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:58:24 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
>
> If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
> the
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:58:24PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Thanks to everybody that worked on this:
> - jokey, starting this version
> - cla, the visual template for this version
> - robbat2, way too much coding and infra wrangling
You guys rock! Thanks for bringing packages.g.o back :-)
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:58 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
Yay! It's soo useful for getting an overview and planning what work we
need to do nex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
> return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
> rewrite.
>
Great.
>
> Thanks to everybody that worked on this:
> - jokey,
After a LOT of development, Gentoo Infra is pleased to announce the
return of the new packages.gentoo.org site. The new site is a complete
rewrite.
If you had bookmarks to the old style of URL, please consult the FAQ for
the new form. We are NOT rewriting these URLs:
'/packages/?category=media-sou
19 matches
Mail list logo
