On Thursday, September 30, 2010 13:32:07 Zac Medico wrote:
> The preserve_old_lib_notify message in postinst is invalid if the
> package doesn't actually own the file. It would be safer to check
> for the file in $D during preinst than to check in $ROOT in postinst
> like that function does.
that
On Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:31:16 Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following
> code:
fix your e-mail client. its line wrapping is broken.
> pkg_postinst() {
On 09/30/2010 08:25 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 09/30/2010 09:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> Get Portage 2.2_rcX (with preserved-libs) feature released into ~arch. ;-)
>
> We probably won't be able to stabilize portage-2.2 at the same time
> as openssl, so we should probably be thinking of more s
On 09/30/2010 09:31 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
>
> pkg_postinst() {
> ...
> has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.
On 09/30/2010 09:40 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Get Portage 2.2_rcX (with preserved-libs) feature released into ~arch. ;-)
We probably won't be able to stabilize portage-2.2 at the same time
as openssl, so we should probably be thinking of more short-term
solutions if this openssl thing is a real
On 09/30/2010 07:31 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
> confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
>
> pkg_postinst() {
> ...
> has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.
Hi,
Just by accident I noticed during emerge something that may lead to major
confusion: the just stabilized openssl-1.0.0-r3 contains the following code:
pkg_postinst() {
...
has_version ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:0.9.8 && return 0
preserve_old_lib_notify /usr/$(get_libdir)/lib
