On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Does that support configurations where I set static addresses
> (including ipv6) and routes (also including ipv6) based on the SSID as
> is allowed by the oldnet scheme of things? I (and probably lots other
> ???power users???) rely
William Hubbs dixit (2010-09-20, 11:16):
> I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is
> centering on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
>
> The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
> control each interface separately, so if you want
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:52:23AM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering
> > on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
>
> Use "oldnet." Wh
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering
> on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
Use "oldnet." Why?
1. We already have a migration guide setup for it:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/
On Monday, September 20, 2010 13:21:25 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500 William Hubbs wrote:
> > The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
> > control each interface separately, so if you want to cycle one
> > interface for some reason, this is not
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:16:08 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
> control each interface separately, so if you want to cycle one
> interface for some reason, this is not doable in that setup. I agree
> this is a serious drawback. Old
All,
I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is centering
on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
control each interface separately, so if you want to cycle one interface
for some reason, this i
