On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Hanno Böck wrote:
> Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
>> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
>> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
>> many software projects (including Chromi
Am Dienstag 10 August 2010 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
> many software projects (including Chromium) target.
>
> Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins inst
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 07:12:39 -0700
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Could you give an example? I'm just curious. Different distros use
> different paths, so that could lead to problems. Or are they trying to
> recognize the running distro?
www-plugins/adobe-flash: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On 8/10/10 9:51 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> Hardcoding paths is a bad design™.
Well, yeah, it could be done better. Hmm, I will think more about it.
On 8/10/10 9:54 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> Why can chromium not do like firefox and others and make the plugins
> dir scalable via a wrapper scri
On 08/10/2010 11:29 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
> many software projects (including Chromium) target.
And that is bad.
> Why are we using nsbrowser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2010 11:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ "mozilla/plugins" to
>> "nsbrowser/plugins"? That would solve the technical problem, while
>>
On Wednesday 11 of August 2010 05:50:47 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
> On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> >> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
> >> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
> >> what many software projects (includin
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ "mozilla/plugins" to
> "nsbrowser/plugins"? That would solve the technical problem, while
> keeping a good, more general name.
some plugins like to change their behavior based on the path
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
>> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
>> what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
>
> Could you name them? Opera looks into tons of di
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700
"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
> However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
> what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Could you name them? Opera looks
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
>> Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
>> relalistic would it be to switch to mozilla/plugins?
>
> --- nsplugins.eclass 1 May 2009 23:03:00 -000
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
relalistic would it be to switch
12 matches
Mail list logo
