Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2016-08-24 23:59, William Hubbs wrote: > Since OpenRC is used outside of Gentoo, a warning like this would have > to be: > > * /etc/init.d/test uses runscript and must be converted to openrc-run > * For more details see the OpenRC NEWS file > > because we don't know where or if the file will b

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2016-08-24 19:07, William Hubbs wrote: > > I do not plan to drop runscript at this point, that will happen when > > openrc-1.0 is released, which will be a while yet. > > ...and that's the reason why I don't think this needs

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2016-08-24 19:07, William Hubbs wrote: > I do not plan to drop runscript at this point, that will happen when > openrc-1.0 is released, which will be a while yet. ...and that's the reason why I don't think this needs a newsitem. There's _no_ problem and no _immediate_ user interaction is requir

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:59:21 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > These things get left in forever. I once filed a bug report > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569056 because the warning that > English word lists in vim had been removed was still present *TWO YEARS* > after the fact. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread waltdnes
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new inst

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Jason Zaman
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > I thought about dropping the version number from the > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version, > would have to read the newsitem. >

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-22 Thread William Hubbs
I thought about dropping the version number from the display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version, would have to read the newsitem. William Title: OpenRC runscript transition Author: William Hubbs C