Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2016-08-24 23:59, William Hubbs wrote: > Since OpenRC is used outside of Gentoo, a warning like this would have > to be: > > * /etc/init.d/test uses runscript and must be converted to openrc-run > * For more details see the OpenRC NEWS file > > because we don't know where or if the file will b

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:41:42PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2016-08-24 19:07, William Hubbs wrote: > > I do not plan to drop runscript at this point, that will happen when > > openrc-1.0 is released, which will be a while yet. > > ...and that's the reason why I don't think this needs

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2016-08-24 19:07, William Hubbs wrote: > I do not plan to drop runscript at this point, that will happen when > openrc-1.0 is released, which will be a while yet. ...and that's the reason why I don't think this needs a newsitem. There's _no_ problem and no _immediate_ user interaction is requir

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:59:21 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > These things get left in forever. I once filed a bug report > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569056 because the warning that > English word lists in vim had been removed was still present *TWO YEARS* > after the fact. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread waltdnes
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new inst

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Jason Zaman
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 07:32:05PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > I thought about dropping the version number from the > > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > > that everyone, including all new ins

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:57:43 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > I thought about dropping the version number from the > display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means > that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version, > would have to read the newsitem. >

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc runscript transition (draft 3)

2016-08-22 Thread William Hubbs
I thought about dropping the version number from the display-if-installed line, but that doesn't make sense because it means that everyone, including all new installs of OpenRC after this version, would have to read the newsitem. William Title: OpenRC runscript transition Author: William Hubbs C

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition (draft 2)

2016-08-22 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Display-If-Installed: > Why the condition on the version number? I suppose I could change this to just sys-apps/openrc > > > # emerge --oneshot -av $(grep -l "#!/sbin/runscr

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition (draft 2)

2016-08-22 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, William Hubbs wrote: > Display-If-Installed: # emerge --oneshot -av $(grep -l "#!/sbin/runscript" /etc/init.d/*) Hm, I think you'll want single quotes there, otherwise the exclamation mark could trigger bash history expansion. Alternatively, grep for /sbin/runscript wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition (draft 2)

2016-08-22 Thread Pacho Ramos
Oops, I saw your second draft later :S El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 14:03 -0500, William Hubbs escribió: > > [...] > If you have any service scripts after running this command that > generate > this warning, please file bugs against the packages that own these > scripts, not against OpenRC. How risk

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition

2016-08-22 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 22-08-2016 a las 12:20 -0500, William Hubbs escribió: > Title: OpenRC runscript transition > Author: William Hubbs > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2016-08-25 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: > Starting with OpenRC 0.21.3, service script authors should us

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition (draft 2)

2016-08-22 Thread William Hubbs
Title: OpenRC runscript transition Author: William Hubbs Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2016-08-25 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: uses runscript, please convert to openrc-run. This warning is not fatal; your system will boot normally. To silence most of the warnings,

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: OpenRC runscript transition

2016-08-22 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is a newsitem about the OpenRC runscript transition. The glep says this should wait 72 hours before being pushed, but since it is already in stable, if no one objects, I would like to push it sooner, and if I do, I'll update the posted date to reflect this. William Title: OpenRC runsc