On Sunday, August 07, 2011 23:32:09 Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers
> > of yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be
> > adding virtual/yacc which h
On Sunday, August 07, 2011 19:21:15 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers
> of yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be
> adding virtual/yacc which has "|| ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc )".
implemented and a
On Aug 8, 2011 12:22 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
> virtual/yacc which has "|| ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc )".
No dev-util/byacc?
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of
> yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding
> virtual/yacc which has "|| ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc )".
>
> once that settle
now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of
yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding
virtual/yacc which has "|| ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc )".
once that settles, i'll probably relocate bison to dev-util.
-mike
signature.
