On 05/05/2012 09:02 PM, Jeff Horelick wrote:
I didn't mention this last night (probably because I was EXTREMELY
tired), but the entire gentoo-x86 tree has been converted to the
virtual (Y!!! *kermitflail*). As long as you don't use any
overlays, you should now be able to switch your pkgco
I didn't mention this last night (probably because I was EXTREMELY
tired), but the entire gentoo-x86 tree has been converted to the
virtual (Y!!! *kermitflail*). As long as you don't use any
overlays, you should now be able to switch your pkgconfig
implementation to pkgconf[pkg-config] or p
On Friday 04 May 2012 05:43:55 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> =dev-util/pkgconfig- with USE="internal-glib" in Portage. I'm
> hoping this will render the pkg-config-lite useless so we can drop it.
>
> I'm very much intrested in knowing if this matches the requirements for
> doing so, so I can decid
On Friday 04 May 2012 05:30:31 Jeff Horelick wrote:
> If anyone would like to help me converting random packages/categories,
> it would be GREATLY appreciated. This is difficult work and it has
> literally taken up almost all of my free time for the past 2 days or
> so, but I have well over half th
On 04/30/2012 01:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
lighter alternative for embedded/alternati
On 2 May 2012 12:06, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:11:58 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
>> we've got an implementation in perl (i'm not interested in), but there is
>> also "pkg-config-lite" and "pkgconf".
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:11:58 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
> we've got an implementation in perl (i'm not interested in), but there is
> also "pkg-config-lite" and "pkgconf". they should be compatible with the
> canonical pk
Hi Mike,
Mike Frysinger writes:
> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
> pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
> any comments ?
I would vote for it!
I feel ill to bootstrap glib and pkg-config. It feels worse to call for
a equal foot
On Monday 30 April 2012 14:27:29 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> +1 for creating the virtual and migrating the tree to use
> virtual/pkgconfig. although, on the otherhand, you could just use
> package.provided for thesetype of unsupported experiments (like i'm
> doing with pkgconfig-openbsd)
ok, with no
On Monday 30 April 2012 15:42:35 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 10:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
> >> runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config.
On 04/30/2012 10:07 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd l
On Sun, 29 Apr 2012 18:11:58 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
> runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>
> for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to
> enable a lighter alternative f
On 30 April 2012 14:27, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 04/30/2012 01:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
>> pkg-
>> config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>>
>> for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but
On 04/30/2012 01:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
lighter alternative for embedded/alternati
On Monday 30 April 2012 02:16:40 Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
> > > I'd just like to say, i'm also an Atheme project member and I have
> > > authorisation from nenolod (the primary pkgconf de
On 30 April 2012 02:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
>> > On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
>> > > r
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:08:34 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
> > On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it
> > > runs pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-co
On 29/04/12 21:17, Jeff Horelick wrote:
> On 30 April 2012 00:08, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
>>> On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
pkg- config when buil
On 30 April 2012 00:08, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
>> On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
>> > pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>>
On Sunday 29 April 2012 18:40:00 Jeff Horelick wrote:
> On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs
> > pkg- config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
> >
> > for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal
On 04/29/12 19:29, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 29/04/12 15:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
>> config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>
>> for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/04/12 15:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
> config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>
> for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to ena
On 29 April 2012 18:11, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
> config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
>
> for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
> lighter alternative for embedded/a
the canonical pkg-config is getting fat. it requires glib-2. it runs pkg-
config when building. glib-2 requires pkg-config. whee.
for our normal systems, this isn't a big deal. but we'd like to enable a
lighter alternative for embedded/alternative systems. as such, i'd like to
introduce a
24 matches
Mail list logo
