Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread hasufell
On 06/20/2013 05:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I'm all for having fun, but I think the

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:56 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >>> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the multilib-build eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread hasufell
On 06/20/2013 04:48 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >> On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >>> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. >> Sorry, I've missed that agreement,

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> I'm all for having fun, but I think the intent was to keep the >> multilib-build eclass usage to a minimum. > Sorry, I've missed that agreement, can you point me to it, please? > Just something

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-20 Thread Michael Weber
On 06/19/2013 06:23 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I guess the follow-up question is this: > > Are there any consumers of these libraries which require the 32-bit > (x86) ABI to be installed? No ... t jet. And not that likely to arise, but I'm out of crystal balls ;-) . > I'm all for having fun, but I

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26 >> Michael Weber napisał(a): >> >>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI} >> >> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web brows

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Thomas Sachau
Michael Weber schrieb: > On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26 >> Michael Weber napisał(a): >> >>> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI} >> >> And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser? >> > > No need for the brow

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Michael Weber
On 06/19/2013 02:16 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26 > Michael Weber napisał(a): > >> - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI} > > And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser? > No need for the browser package (just fun) but I'd li

Re: [gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-06-19, o godz. 14:09:26 Michael Weber napisał(a): > - multilib builds and rename non-DEFAULT_ABI $bins to $bin.${ABI} And why exactly do you need multilib for a web browser? -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] netsurf.eclass proposal

2013-06-19 Thread Michael Weber
Hello, I'd like to add a new eclass for www-client/netsurf related ebuilds and seek your review and approval. I'll add it in two days, if unchallenged. === Motivation === The browser projects started out as a stray set of components [1], some without releases. In the meantime, all stuff is pres