On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
>
> So, users will just move config in an elog? Oh, and they don't even use.
see what happens when you delete context ?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:17:13 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Maybe. On the other hand, the udev->systemd switch was performed
> upstream which makes it a valid candidate for package move.
No, it's not a valid candidate for a package move if the destination
package already exists. A "move" is specific
On 26/11/2012 10:17, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Howsabout following the same procedure as when xpdf was dropped? I
> vaguely remember "emerge --update --deep world" stopping with a message
> that xpdf was being dropped, and also a few alternatives were suggested
> in the message.
That's the p.maks me
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote
>
> the inability to "make" users read the package.mask message explaining
> the situation is the only valid point in your e-mail.
>
> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
Howsabout following the same pro
On 11/26/2012 01:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
>
> So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
> need to manually move config files and update logrota
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> along those lines, a news entry is probably not even necessary.
So, users will just suddenly have their binary change names, and will
need to manually move config files and update logrotate.d files (if in
use), and the only notice will be i
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> xchat & hexchat are different packages. It's a bit like pretending that
> the discontinuation and fork didn't ever happen, and the packages are
> equivalent (which they are not, as have been already pointed out).
they're about as equivalent as
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 05:07:53 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> >>> I als
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 04:18:40 -0500
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> >>> I also planned to release a news through the portage news syst
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as
>>> I
>>> lastrite xchat so people know how to move
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 17:26:30 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> >> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon
> >> as I lastrite xchat so people know how to
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
>> lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did
>> this
>> before I'd like to
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
> lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did this
> before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some
> documenta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>> Do xchat plugins work in hexchat?
>
> That's something for me to find out as well. I maintain the
> xchat-otr plugin which I would like to continue using in hexchat.
>
just tested xchat-xsys on hexchat and it does work, all commands afais
---
Am Sonntag 25 November 2012, 22:03:03 schrieb hasufell:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> > Hey list,
> >
> > I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of
> > weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/25/2012 09:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of
> weeks. Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be
> resumed didn't come true. As the code becomes more and more
>
On 11/25/2012 12:27 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> I also planned to release a news through the portage news system as soon as I
> lastrite xchat so people know how to move over to hexchat. As I never did
> this
> before I'd like to have some help concerning this matter. Is there some
> documentatio
Hey list,
I'm planning to lastrite net-irc/xchat in the next couple of weeks.
Unfortunately my hope that upstream development would be resumed didn't come
true. As the code becomes more and more outdated, open unfixed security bugs
are present[1][2] and at some point in the future =x11-libs/gtk+
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> The code in question has been replaced with a sysfs tree-walker that
> should find the AGP video card in any system. If anyone out there has a
> PCI-Express adapter, I'd like to know if this code finds it or not.
Alright, I found the regressio
Works here without problem
On Sun, 2005-17-04 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
> patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
> the /video output gives you the right information.
> If I get 10 repo
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:33 +0100, Tony Vroon wrote:
> Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
> patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
> the /video output gives you the right information.
> If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unma
Could any xchat-xsys users that are not afraid of using an experimental
patch unmask version 1.9.3 with /etc/portage/package.unmask and see if
the /video output gives you the right information.
If I get 10 reports that it works, I'll unmask it and unleash it on ~x86
and ~amd64.
(Any other arches wi
23 matches
Mail list logo
