* Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> Lack of time is fully understandable. It's a big package and takes a
> long time to compile and debug.
Yeah, IMHO the whole mozilla stuff has been grown too big.
nspr already should be fall apart into several packages, the
XUL core another one, ea
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 22:30 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> >> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
> >> will be p.masking them tonight a
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:39:39 -0500
"Jory A. Pratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna
> cause some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages
> break pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
>> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
>> some issues with stable tr
On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
> some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
> please reference bug http
As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
please reference bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137665 If
you are able to pro
