Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-24 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:37:26 -0500 Richard Freeman wrote: > I think we should definitely have some way of designating which > should be the contact for bugs. I've had some bugs sit around for a > while without being noticed because they were assigned to the herd > the package is in, and not to m

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-24 Thread Richard Freeman
On 12/23/2009 01:36 PM, Paul de Vrieze wrote: Perhaps we should create a schema to validate the file. XMLSchema (or any of the other standards) allows for much more flexibility in specifying these things. Btw. I did not design the metadata DTD for order to be significant. The only priority is th

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-23 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote: > Le 15/12/2009 16:19, Peter Volkov a écrit : >> >> we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first >>  then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with >> different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-16 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 15/12/2009 16:19, Peter Volkov a écrit : we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279206#c4 . Others and I actually make use of the order in metad

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 10:19:00 Peter Volkov wrote: > we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first > then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with > different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279206#c4 . > > Hans's suggestion http://bugs.gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-15 Thread Alex Alexander
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:19:00PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: > So what we will do with this? It'll be great to fix dtd to follow our > requirements, but there is a problem: > > if we change dtd like this: > > > > we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first > then oth

Re: [gentoo-dev] metdata.dtd should require

2009-12-15 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 07/12/2009 в 21:20 +0100, Thilo Bangert пишет: > Hans de Graaff said: > > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote: > > > dev-util/cucumbermissing > > > > Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies > > > upstream)* )> > indeed: