On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:37:26 -0500
Richard Freeman wrote:
> I think we should definitely have some way of designating which
> should be the contact for bugs. I've had some bugs sit around for a
> while without being noticed because they were assigned to the herd
> the package is in, and not to m
On 12/23/2009 01:36 PM, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
Perhaps we should create a schema to validate the file. XMLSchema (or
any of the other standards) allows for much more flexibility in
specifying these things. Btw. I did not design the metadata DTD for
order to be significant. The only priority is th
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 15/12/2009 16:19, Peter Volkov a écrit :
>>
>> we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first
>> then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with
>> different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Le 15/12/2009 16:19, Peter Volkov a écrit :
we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first
then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with
different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279206#c4 .
Others and I actually make use of the order in metad
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 10:19:00 Peter Volkov wrote:
> we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first
> then other tags. Currently there are about 200 ebuilds with
> different order http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279206#c4 .
>
> Hans's suggestion http://bugs.gen
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:19:00PM +0300, Peter Volkov wrote:
> So what we will do with this? It'll be great to fix dtd to follow our
> requirements, but there is a problem:
>
> if we change dtd like this:
>
>
>
> we will force all metadata.xml files have strict order of tags: first
> then oth
В Пнд, 07/12/2009 в 21:20 +0100, Thilo Bangert пишет:
> Hans de Graaff said:
> > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:56 +0100, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > > dev-util/cucumbermissing
> >
> > Fixed, but this is really a bug in metadata.dtd, which specifies
> > > upstream)* )>
> indeed: