Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > How about "contact" instead of team. > there is no meaning to a contact besides being CC'ed on bugs. Please simply call it cc then? :) //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:23:57 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:26 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for > > > featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It als

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-12 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2014-12-10 10:41, Sergey Popov wrote: > 09.12.2014 14:59, Ulrich Mueller пишет: > > "proxy-maintainer" is very confusing because you won't put the proxy > > maintainer there, but the user who is being proxied. Please rename > > to something like "proxied" (assuming that this exists as a word in

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 12:59:26 > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > >> >> As the previously stated goal was to get rid of herds, I don't >> understand why you want to reintroduce them as a value of the >> type attribute. The existing herd elemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. >> The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. > >> We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can sign

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Sergey Popov
09.12.2014 14:59, Ulrich Mueller пишет: > "proxy-maintainer" is very confusing because you won't put the proxy > maintainer there, but the user who is being proxied. Please rename > to something like "proxied" (assuming that this exists as a word in > English) or "by-proxy". +1 for that. Proxy ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny napisał(a): > So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I > have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully > make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: And the Council meeting brought a

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Luca Barbato
On 09/12/14 17:34, Michał Górny wrote: I'm all for keeping it simple. However, backwards compatibility makes it hard to keep things simple. I'd love to do, say, metadata.yml supporting stuff like: - maintainer: f...@gentoo.org, b...@gentoo.org - maintainer: - name: Foo Bar email: f...@

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-10 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > I thought we were generally agreed we wanted to get rid of herds. > The goal wasn't to rename them, but to get rid of them. > We could have email aliases for bugs so that people can sign up for > notifications, but they would NOT be considered maint

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 10:15:09 Michał Górny napisał(a): > Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 > Michał Górny napisał(a): > > > Hello, all. > > > > So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I > > have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 18:59:22 Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > That is *precisely the goal* of this. We scratch and > > , and just use well-supported tag. type="" > > is entirely optional, unobtrusive and backwards-compatible with > > existin

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > That is *precisely the goal* of this. We scratch and > , and just use well-supported tag. type="" > is entirely optional, unobtrusive and backwards-compatible with > existing apps. And yes, with just tag the rule in bug > assignment is always to t

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 17:17:35 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > > > > As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all of us > > > is still by hand in a text editor, and I prefer a lot typing > > > > > > kde > > > > > > over > > > > > > kde > > > > > > k...@gentoo.

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all of us > > is still by hand in a text editor, and I prefer a lot typing > > > > kde > > > > over > > > > kde > > > k...@gentoo.org > Lovely KDE herd > > > to be more precise. Ugh. Even more ugly stuff from the depar

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 12:59:26 Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for > > featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd > > typing maintainers is but if you really fee

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 16:49:24 "Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a): > Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2014, 00:46:28 schrieb Michał Górny: > > 2. Convert to , > > Could any please explain to me why this additional > xmlfication is of any ? > > As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml fil

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Dienstag 09 Dezember 2014, 00:46:28 schrieb Michał Górny: > 2. Convert to , Could any please explain to me why this additional xmlfication is of any ? As far as I know the typical way to edit metadata.xml files for all of us is still by hand in a text editor, and I prefer a lot typing kde

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for > > featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd > > typing maintainers is but if you really feel lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for > featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It also proves how absurd > typing maintainers is but if you really feel like having it, sure. > The default is 'developer', tags would be conv

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-12-09, o godz. 00:46:28 Michał Górny napisał(a): > Hello, all. > > So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I > have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully > make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: > > 1. Add type="

[gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-08 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, all. So considering the previous thread, the Council and QA discussions, I have prepared a new version of the metadata.xml update. To hopefully make everyone happy, I come with this three-step process: 1. Add type="" attribute to tag (see attached patch), 2. Convert to , 3. Eventually