On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:35:43AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am
> leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to
> do later is add toolchain-funcs back to inherit and uncomment the code
> once I
Ok, that makes sense. Are from sweden where you can't give up copyright, so
didn't even think considerd that it wasn't tied to a person.
Thanks /EKG
On 5 May 2017 20:33, "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:20:43 +
> Erik Närström wrote:
>
> > I'snt copyright deth of au
On Fri, 5 May 2017 14:05:38 -0400
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> That means if you author something in 2017, and put down say
> 1999-2017. You are starting at 1999, and not 2017. Losing 16 years
Er 18 back to 1st grade...
--
William L. Thomson Jr.
pgpuBuutCVu7b.pgp
Description: OpenPG
On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:20:43 +
Erik Närström wrote:
> I'snt copyright deth of author +70yrs?
Yes for work that is copyright to say you or me. Something copyright to
an immortal entity I believe is different. Even if Gentoo ended, not
sure that is the same as a person dying. We essential give
I'snt copyright deth of author +70yrs?
On 5 May 2017 20:06, "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2017 13:18:58 -0400
> "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200
> > Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > > On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
>
On Fri, 5 May 2017 13:18:58 -0400
"William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation
> >
> > Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years he
On Fri, 05 May 2017 18:55:41 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation
>
> Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years here?
It applies when something comes into existing. If this eclass did not
exist in 20
On pią, 2017-05-05 at 10:35 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation
Aren't we supposed to use the full range of years here?
> # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>
> # @ECLASS: meson.eclass
> # @MAINTAINER:
> # William Hubbs
> # @BLURB: co
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:24:03PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am
> > leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to
> > do later is ad
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:35 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am
> leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to
> do later is add toolchain-funcs back to inherit and uncomment the code
> once I know how
All,
here is the third (and hopefully final) draft of meson.eclass. I am
leaving the code in for the cross support but commented so all I need to
do later is add toolchain-funcs back to inherit and uncomment the code
once I know how to write the cross file, which shouldn't take too long.
I added a
11 matches
Mail list logo
