On 11/08/10 00:08, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> On 11/07/10 13:07, Mike Auty wrote:
>> On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
>>> you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
>>
>>> So I'll try ag
On 11/10/2010 07:16 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>> On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sendin
On 11/10/10 18:16, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>> On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sending thi
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:05:17PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri R??ty wrote:
> >> On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? Th
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be ${WORKDIR}/${module
On 11/08/2010 06:17 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
>>> where
>>> the final clone of repository will be placed,
On 16:42 Sun 07 Nov , Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to
> > where
> > the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
> > ${WORKDIR}/${module}
> > (wher
On 11/07/10 13:07, Mike Auty wrote:
> On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
>> you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
>
>> So I'll try again: if you really want to do this change, you mi
On 11/06/2010 11:22 AM, Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
> the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
> ${WORKDIR}/${module}
> (where module usually is the last component of source URI) to ${WORKDI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/10 02:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> I read it more closely and realized I was a little confused by the way
> you listed all the bullet points mixing together benefits and problems.
>
> So I'll try again: if you really want to do this change,
On 21:30 Sat 06 Nov , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 10:22 Sat 06 Nov , Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> > I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is
> > to where the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
> > ${WORKDIR}/${module} (where module usually is
On 10:22 Sat 06 Nov , Krzysztof Pawlik wrote:
> I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is
> to where the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be
> ${WORKDIR}/${module} (where module usually is the last component of
> source URI) to ${WORKDIR}/${P}
Hello,
I'm sending this patch for discussion, what it changes? The change is to where
the final clone of repository will be placed, it used to be ${WORKDIR}/${module}
(where module usually is the last component of source URI) to ${WORKDIR}/${P}
(essentially ${S}). This has few effects:
- ebuilds
13 matches
Mail list logo
