Re: [gentoo-dev] mass stabilization and non-x86-non-amd64 arches

2011-12-17 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/17/2011 05:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc arches like ppc. One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once" Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that it's repoman-possible to

Re: [gentoo-dev] mass stabilization and non-x86-non-amd64 arches

2011-12-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:38:31 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > El sáb, 17-12-2011 a las 16:22 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > > For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I > > didn't cc arches like ppc. And correctly so. > > One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] mass stabilization and non-x86-non-amd64 arches

2011-12-17 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 17-12-2011 a las 16:22 +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc > arches like ppc. > > One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once" > Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that

[gentoo-dev] mass stabilization and non-x86-non-amd64 arches

2011-12-17 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
For several mass-filed stabilization bugs I got comments why I didn't cc arches like ppc. One problem is that I cc x86 and amd64 via "edit many bugs at once" Bugzilla feature, and when filing bugs the script checks that it's repoman-possible to stabilize given package on x86 and amd64. Not all pa