Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages

2010-10-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 10/12/10 3:32 AM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: > This is where the -bin package should be shipping all its libs that it > will require, just as firefox-bin does. If you are rolling the -bin > package you should include them yourself, and set the launch script to > read its install dir before system dir,

Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages

2010-10-11 Thread Jory A. Pratt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2010 09:40 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. > The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. > > It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using

Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages

2010-10-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, October 11, 2010 10:40:43 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. > The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. > > It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the > bug reporter had

Re: [gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages

2010-10-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/11/2010 04:40 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. > The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. > > It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the > bug reporter had gcc-4.4.3

[gentoo-dev] libstdc++ compatibility and -bin packages

2010-10-11 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
Today I got http://bugs.gentoo.org/340517 filed against chromium-bin. The machine that compiled the package had only gcc-4.4.3 installed. It'd probably be difficult to solve the problem using dependencies (the bug reporter had gcc-4.4.3 installed, but active version was 4.3.4). I was thinking abo