On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Срд, 16/01/2008 в 06:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> > if two packages provide the same binary and they blocked each other, a
> > move would be doable as it would be impossible for the two packages to be
> > installed simultaneously. but as P
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you
В Срд, 16/01/2008 в 06:09 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> if two packages provide the same binary and they blocked each other, a move
> would be doable as it would be impossible for the two packages to be
> installed simultaneously. but as Petteri points out, libdca/libdts dont
> provide the sam
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
> > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > > On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > >> Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
> > >>> Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
> >
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет:
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> > On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
> >>> Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
> >>> libdts?
> >> Package moves don't work very well if you mo
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
another.
unless they had a block in place ...
-m
On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
> > Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
> > libdts?
>
> Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
> another.
unless they had a block in place ...
-mike
signature.
Peter Volkov kirjoitti:
Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge
libdts?
Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to
another.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:28:36 +0300
Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> В Вск, 13/01/2008 в 11:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen пишет:
> > # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13 Jan 2008)
> > # Masked for removal in about 60 days.
> > # libdts is replaced by libdca.
> > media-libs/libdts
> > =med
В Вск, 13/01/2008 в 11:06 +0200, Samuli Suominen пишет:
> # Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13 Jan 2008)
> # Masked for removal in about 60 days.
> # libdts is replaced by libdca.
> media-libs/libdts
> =media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216
> =media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2006*
> =media-video/ffmpeg
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13 Jan 2008)
# Masked for removal in about 60 days.
# libdts is replaced by libdca.
media-libs/libdts
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2006*
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070129
=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070325
=media-video/ffmp
11 matches
Mail list logo
