On Thursday 10 May 2007, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > All packages with maintainer-needed will be moved to
> > no-herd.
>
> maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a dev
> is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for when
> the pack
> Can you re-run this with a fully up to date tree?
sure
app-emulation/hercules invalid herd: s390
sys-apps/cpint invalid herd: s390
sys-apps/lkcdutils invalid herd: s390
sys-apps/s390-oco invalid herd: s390
Found
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Thilo Bangert wrote:
All packages with maintainer-needed will be moved to
no-herd.
maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a
dev is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for
when the pa
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > All packages with maintainer-needed will be moved to
> > no-herd.
>
> maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a
> dev is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for
> when the package is
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> the following list of packages uses a invalid tag in its
> metadata.xml. Invalid in the sense of 'could-not-be-found-in-herds.xml'
>
> Most of them appear to be simple mis-spellings or minor misunderstandings.
> Others may lack an entry in herds.xml (s390
> Hi everybody,
>
> the following list of packages uses a invalid tag in its
> metadata.xml. Invalid in the sense of 'could-not-be-found-in-herds.xml'
FWIW, I've been providing similar results on a daily basis for some time
now at GPNL (Gentoo Packages that Need Lovin) website:
http://spaceparan
Hi everybody,
the following list of packages uses a invalid tag in its
metadata.xml. Invalid in the sense of 'could-not-be-found-in-herds.xml'
Most of them appear to be simple mis-spellings or minor misunderstandings.
Others may lack an entry in herds.xml (s390?).
AFAICT most packages have st
