Re: [gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-15 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Angelo Arrifano wrote: > Hello all, > > I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree: > > gpe-go > gpe-julia > gpe-life > gpe-lights > gpe-othello > gpe-tetris > gsoko > xdemineur > > They are only a few and they won't increase

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-14 Thread Dean Stephens
Angelo Arrifano wrote: > Moving each game to the games- category would be another solution > but that would pretty much hide the relation with the GPE Palm Environment. > The gpe- prefix on, most of, the package names should provide a subtle clue, it could be added to those that lack it. Unles

[gentoo-dev] gpe-games: new category

2009-07-14 Thread Angelo Arrifano
Hello all, I have the following packages that need a home in the portage tree: gpe-go gpe-julia gpe-life gpe-lights gpe-othello gpe-tetris gsoko xdemineur They are only a few and they won't increase much in the future. For this reason I'm reticent in creating the gpe-games category in the portag