On Saturday 29 December 2012 20:24:16 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into
> a USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which
> means it'd default to off.
sounds like people can handle this, so i've added it to 2.
On Monday 31 December 2012 18:23:06 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> >> Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
> >> worked: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> You realize that files are cached in RAM right?
>
> Yes, I know how operating systems work.
>
>> More than likely those pages are always in cache.
>
> Did you read my reply at all? Yo
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> You realize that files are cached in RAM right?
Yes, I know how operating systems work.
> More than likely those pages are always in cache.
Did you read my reply at all? You are assuming ideal conditions
(enough free RAM), for a specific
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> flatfile lookups are 2-4ms with hot cache. How much faster is the db
>> option?
>
> I guess it depends on the implementation and how close is the system's
> operational situation to an
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
> flatfile lookups are 2-4ms with hot cache. How much faster is the db
> option?
I guess it depends on the implementation and how close is the system's
operational situation to an ideal one (whether swap started thrashing,
etc.). A DB is the prop
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>>>
>>> Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
>>> worked: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
>>
>> Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
>> worked: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432020
>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
On Sunday 30 December 2012 13:47:40 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > because i suspect it's dead weight for most people, especially desktop
> > users.
>
> Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they
> worked: https://bug
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> because i suspect it's dead weight for most people, especially desktop users.
Desktop users would probably benefit more from glibc databases, if they worked:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432020
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show
On Sunday 30 December 2012 03:46:01 Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it
> > into a USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd
> > which means it'd default to off.
On 30/12/2012 02:24, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
> USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
> it'd default to off.
I use it on my servers, but I'm fine with turning it on myself.
You still
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
> USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
> it'd default to off.
> -mike
To be fair, in my large enterprise deployment we have
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Michael Weber wrote:
> On 12/30/2012 02:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ?
> I use it for some pam_ldap machines
>
>> ... it'd default to off.
> fine with me, I'll turn it on / need it for `ls -l /home` not taking
On 12/29/12 5:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
> USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
> it'd default to off.
If you want, you can still enable the nscd USE flag in the profile so it
On 12/30/2012 02:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ?
I use it for some pam_ldap machines
> ... it'd default to off.
fine with me, I'll turn it on / need it for `ls -l /home` not taking ages.
--
Michael Weber
Gentoo Developer
web: https://xmw.de/
rough poll: how many people actually care about nscd ? i'm making it into a
USE flag for glibc-2.17 and it's easiest for me to do IUSE=nscd which means
it'd default to off.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
17 matches
Mail list logo
