On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:35:27 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 13 April 2013 13:06:04 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:08:10 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy & pasted some
> > > line a long time ago than baselayout mod
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> it's at times like this i wish we had a git repo. `git log -p -C -M` is great
> at tracking this sort of stuff down.
I don't want to hijack this thread, but I don't believe we have a
tracker for the migration of docs / website / etc to git
On Saturday 13 April 2013 13:06:04 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:08:10 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy & pasted some
> > line a long time ago than baselayout modified it for you.
>
> Exactly, but where did that come from?
prob
> "JR" == Jeroen Roovers writes:
JR> On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:08:10 -0400
JR> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy & pasted some
>> line a long time ago than baselayout modified it for you.
JR> Exactly, but where did that come from?
If it didn't com
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:08:10 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy & pasted some
> line a long time ago than baselayout modified it for you.
Exactly, but where did that come from?
> two people who have installs that are a decade old doesn't incline
On Friday 12 April 2013 15:41:55 James Cloos wrote:
> > "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> >> It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
>
> MF> don't do that.
>
> *I* didn't.
that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy & pasted some line a
long time ago than baselayout
On Friday 12 April 2013 13:20:11 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted
> > and the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts
> > mounted at all, then it assumes you
> "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
>> It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
MF> don't do that.
*I* didn't.
I don't know /what/ added it, but something did. With noauto, just like
the other reported case.
It shouldn't matter how rare it is though. A general announcement won
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted and
>> the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts mounted at
>> all,
>> then it assumes y
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted and
> the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts mounted at all,
> then it assumes you know what you're doing.
What I am saying is that you make no
On Friday 12 April 2013 02:50:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i plan on updating the latest glibc to add USE=suid. in pkg_preinst and
> > ROOT==/, the ebuild will read /proc/mounts for a devpts line with gid=5.
> > if it doesn't find one, i'l
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i plan on updating the latest glibc to add USE=suid. in pkg_preinst and
> ROOT==/, the ebuild will read /proc/mounts for a devpts line with gid=5. if
> it doesn't find one, i'll have it call `die`.
What about chroot builds? I have /dev/pt
On Thursday 11 April 2013 11:43:59 James Cloos wrote:
> > "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
> MF> this should impact very few (if any)
> MF> users, so i don't think a news item makes sense.
>
> It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
don't do that. delete the line.
> I doubt tha
> "MF" == Mike Frysinger writes:
MF> this should impact very few (if any)
MF> users, so i don't think a news item makes sense.
It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
I doubt that any say gid=5.
I don't remember why this box has it in fstab; it looks like it always did.
The
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 14:56:26 Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > tl;dr: make sure your /dev/pts is mounted correctly w/gid=5 or bad things
> > will happen and it's (probably) all your fault
>
> So, who is this directed to?
any dev who maintains
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> tl;dr: make sure your /dev/pts is mounted correctly w/gid=5 or bad things will
> happen and it's (probably) all your fault
So, who is this directed to? If this is to anybody who uses Gentoo,
then at best this should be a place to hash out
On 4/9/13 10:15 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i plan on updating the latest glibc to add USE=suid. in pkg_preinst and
> ROOT==/, the ebuild will read /proc/mounts for a devpts line with gid=5. if
> it doesn't find one, i'll have it call `die`. if the bsd pty scenario wasn't
> long dead, and the
tl;dr: make sure your /dev/pts is mounted correctly w/gid=5 or bad things will
happen and it's (probably) all your fault
when you run grantpt(), glibc attempts to set up your pty with correct
ownership & permissions. it does so by executing a setuid helper called
pt_chown as needed. we all kn
18 matches
Mail list logo
