On 03/15/12 at 08:11PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
> >
> > The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> > ago. New news items should be committed to git only, beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/15/2012 07:49 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git
>>> some time ago. New news items should be committed to git only,
>>> because the master
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some
>> time ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because
>> the master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
> Is there a link to the repository anywhere?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
>
Is there a link to the repository anywh
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
>
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any
Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
Especially, this concerns the news about udev unmasking that w