Michael Cummings wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:43:58AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
>> -t fixed (not in svn yet, but it was an easy thing to fix)
>>
>> trying to compile something that should take more than an hour on my box to
>> make
>> sure -c is fixed also. Sorry about the shoddy
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
> > things (genloop and qlop)
>
> Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date,
> for example).
because
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:28:52 +0200
Timothy Redaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
> things (genloop and qlop)
Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date, for
example).
Also, as long as involved peo
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:28:52PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
> things (genloop and qlop)
gollee, we wouldn't want competing products, would we? I mean, imagine if
someone tried writing a competitor for emerge??
:P
This
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
> things (genloop and qlop)
doubt it'll be possible to convince the developers to merge here ... genlop is
written in perl and qlop is written in C ...
-mike
pgpb0w0E2LgeK.pg
Michael Cummings ha scritto:
> Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested
> users
> filing bugs, so
>
> genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release
> based
> on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjoy :)
Imho is a waste of time
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:43:58AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> -t fixed (not in svn yet, but it was an easy thing to fix)
>
> trying to compile something that should take more than an hour on my box to
> make
> sure -c is fixed also. Sorry about the shoddy release,
>
can anyone tell i'm hav
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:12:53AM -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Sun Apr 8 21:24:11 2007 >>>
> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.0_rc1
>merge time: 3 hours, and 37 seconds.
>
> Mon Apr 9 00:36:46 2007 >>>
> mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-2.0.0.0_rc1
>merge
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:12:53AM -0500, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> No idea, but I've noticed a minor cosmetic bug in the display of time
> with genlop (both -t and -c)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ genlop -t mozilla-thunderbird
> * mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird
>
> Tue Aug 22 12:18:24 200
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 09:54:47AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Does this mean we're hosting the project now?
>
Yes, currently under gentoo-perl's svn tree. The former upstream developers have
willingly ceded it over to me (I've retained their names in the info/docs as
original authors, but r
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:03 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested users
filing bugs, so
genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release based
on what was open in bugs.gento
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 11:03 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested
> users
> filing bugs, so
>
> genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release
> based
> on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjo
Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested users
filing bugs, so
genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release based
on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjoy :)
--
-o()o--
Michael
13 matches
Mail list logo
