On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:15:19 +0100
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/20/11 22:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > Version bumps have no place on the dev-announce list /unless/ they
> > impact developers' work directly.
>
> Fine.
>
>
> > (and not because you want to celebrate the glory of another vers
On 01/20/11 22:06, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Version bumps have no place on the dev-announce list /unless/ they
> impact developers' work directly.
Fine.
> (and not because you want to celebrate the glory of another version release).
I'm not sure if I'm just interpreting things, but I wish you wo
On 01/20/11 21:55, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Unless if you are on some git repo, we have commit mails which can serve
> this purpose very well.
I am on a git repo, and a commit list serves a different purpose: low
level tracking of changes.
Sebastian
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:57:46 +0100
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/20/11 21:45, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen
> > wrote:
> >> Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be
> >> announced on these developer-related lists.
> >
> > Tend to agr
On 01/20/11 21:45, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on
>> these developer-related lists.
>
> Tend to agree, at least in general. If a genkernel upgrade impacted
> multiple teams/etc
On 20-01-2011 21:47:19 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/20/11 21:38, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on
> > these developer-related lists.
>
> It's not about the package, it's about the release itself.
> I don't send mails on pac
On 01/20/11 21:38, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on
> these developer-related lists.
It's not about the package, it's about the release itself.
I don't send mails on package bumps I do.
Sebastian
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> Like Jeroen, I don't think new package releases should be announced on
> these developer-related lists.
Tend to agree, at least in general. If a genkernel upgrade impacted
multiple teams/etc, such as requiring changes to install media, or
On 20-01-2011 21:34:36 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/20/11 21:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100
> > Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> >
> >> This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier
> >> releases).
> >
> > I'm a Gentoo developer.
> > I've n
On 01/20/11 21:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100
> Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>
>> This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier
>> releases).
>
> I'm a Gentoo developer.
> I've never used genkernel for private purposes.
> So I don't see why you would
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:00:06 +0100
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier
> releases).
I'm a Gentoo developer.
I've never used genkernel for private purposes.
So I don't see why you would send this to gentoo-dev@ and
gentoo-dev-announce@.
Hello!
This release fixes two bugs both affecting 3.4.11 (not earlier releases).
Bugs fixed
==
351906 Move application of kernel config after "make mrproper" as that
deletes .config (whereas "make clean" does not)
351909 busybox 1.18.1: Return of mdstart as an applet (regres
12 matches
Mail list logo
