Re: Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017, 23:32:19 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > OK since > > a) nobody from toolchain responds here, > b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but > c) noone wants to do it himself, and Forget this. William already did it. YAY!!! -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@ge

Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
OK since a) nobody from toolchain responds here, b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but c) noone wants to do it himself, and d) I dont have the time to do all the research I deem necessary to do it myself, let's harness the power of the developer community. https://wiki.gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Matthias Maier
> After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went > ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0. Thanks a lot! Did you update any keywording bug (if one is open at all)? Best, Matthias signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:43:11AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > Hey all, > > I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into > packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order > to build [1]. > > I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm > wondering wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2017-05-03 21:25, Matthias Maier wrote: > Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time. +1 -- Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Matthias Maier
> Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating > with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**] Same here. The gcc-6 incompatibilities were resolved quite a while ago. Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time. Best, Matthias

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm > wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not > talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-) > Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no probl

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread Hanno Böck
On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:43:11 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm > wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not > talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-) Given that gcc 7.1 was just released and gcc 6 isn't even keyworded yet I'm

[gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-03 Thread William Hubbs
Hey all, I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order to build [1]. I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not talking about stable ke