Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017, 23:32:19 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
> OK since
>
> a) nobody from toolchain responds here,
> b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but
> c) noone wants to do it himself, and
Forget this. William already did it. YAY!!!
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@ge
OK since
a) nobody from toolchain responds here,
b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but
c) noone wants to do it himself, and
d) I dont have the time to do all the research I deem necessary to do it
myself,
let's harness the power of the developer community.
https://wiki.gento
> After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went
> ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0.
Thanks a lot!
Did you update any keywording bug (if one is open at all)?
Best,
Matthias
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:43:11AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
> to build [1].
>
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering wh
On 2017-05-03 21:25, Matthias Maier wrote:
> Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.
+1
--
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating
> with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no problems. [*] [**]
Same here. The gcc-6 incompatibilities were resolved quite a while
ago. Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time.
Best,
Matthias
>
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
>
Just as a datapoint, my main dev system is ~80% stable and has been updating
with gcc-6 since beginning of february; no probl
On Wed, 3 May 2017 11:43:11 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
> wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
> talking about stable keywords, just ~. ;-)
Given that gcc 7.1 was just released and gcc 6 isn't even keyworded yet
I'm
Hey all,
I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into
packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order
to build [1].
I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm
wondering when it will get them? Does anyone have any idea? I'm not
talking about stable ke