-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 15:46:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
=gcc-3.4.3-r1 and
lemme rephrase
what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can punt the
libffi packag
On Friday 02 September 2005 02:12 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
> > =gcc-3.4.3-r1 and > 'objc' is used (regardless of 'gcj', which always installs it); i.e.
> > the patch is already in there for that stated range of versions.
lemme rephrase
what needs to happen in the gcc ebuilds so that we can p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 13:07:23 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to phase out dev-libs/libffi for a long while...if
someone can figure out a patch for gcc-3.3 series that compiles and
installs libffi w/o building the entirety o
On Friday 02 September 2005 01:00 pm, Armando Di Cianno wrote:
> On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> >> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-09-02 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
gcc-3.3.6
to x86 stable ?
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:05:38 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
| > Mike Frysinger wrote:
| > > any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
| > > gcc-3.3.6 to x86 stable ?
| >
| > You'll also need a matc
On Friday 02 September 2005 11:50 am, Gustavo Zacarias wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6
> > to x86 stable ?
>
> You'll also need a matching dev-libs/libffi, otherwise it'll go all
> circular for people using GNUstep.
toolc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6 to
> x86 stable ?
You'll also need a matching dev-libs/libffi, otherwise it'll go all
circular for people using GNUstep.
- --
Gustavo Zacarias
Gentoo/
On Friday 02 September 2005 08:40 am, Mike Doty wrote:
> I've had issues compiling 3.3.6 with the hardened toolchain(cc1 dies
> with a try_split error), but I hear that this is specific to hardened.
that, unfortunately, is both specific to hardened and unspecific to
gcc-3.3.6 ... 3.3.5 and 3.4.x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
| any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move
gcc-3.3.6 to
| x86 stable ?
|
| for those brave, please emerge gcc-3.3.6 on your stable x86 box and
give it a
| twirl
| -mike
I've had issues compiling 3.3.6 with
any known/standing issues people wish to get out before we move gcc-3.3.6 to
x86 stable ?
for those brave, please emerge gcc-3.3.6 on your stable x86 box and give it a
twirl
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
