Re: [gentoo-dev] euses(1) Reimplementation

2020-07-09 Thread Ashley Dixon
Hi Fabian, cheers for your response. On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:39:30AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Sounds like you've put some work into this. You could compare against > `quse -D ` (from portage-utils) as well to get another point of > measure. quse is about half as fast as my tool, however

Re: [gentoo-dev] euses(1) Reimplementation

2020-07-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi Ashley, Sounds like you've put some work into this. You could compare against `quse -D ` (from portage-utils) as well to get another point of measure. I don't know what you did measure euses against though, it seems fairly fast to me (env PORTDIR=`q -e PORTDIR` euses -v libressl), is there a

[gentoo-dev] euses(1) Reimplementation

2020-07-08 Thread Ashley Dixon
Hi, Gentoo-Dev. A while ago, I had a bit of a rant on Gentoo-User regarding the current issues with `app-portage/euses`. Specifically, the fact that it does not work on newer Gentoo-like systems which have moved away from PORTDIR and conform to the repos.conf/ syntax [1, 2, 3]. There ar