On Friday 20 April 2012 16:06:02 Leho Kraav wrote:
> On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up.
> >
> >> $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources
> >
> > that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be ins
On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up.
$ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources
that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the
ebuild.
I can't see how having this available could hurt any
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#)
level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to kill
off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd like to s
On Friday 20 April 2012 15:38:19 Leho Kraav wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz
> > (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they
> > want to kill off the e
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#)
> level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to
> kill
> off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd
On Thursday 19 April 2012 23:24:19 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> @@ -445,6 +473,7 @@ epatch() {
> local patch_cmd
> while [[ ${count} -lt 5 ]] ; do
> patch_cmd="${BASH_ALIASES[patch]:-patch} -p${count}
> +einfo $patch_cmd
>
> # Gen
no complaints, so here's the patch. precedence order is EPATCH_COMMON_OPTS
then EPATCH_OPTS then whatever has been specified on the cmdline.
so you can do:
EPATCH_OPTS="-F0"
epatch
epatch -p0
epatch
(more for highlighting precedence than a realistic use case)
-m
it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#)
level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to kill
off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd like to split
these off and improve the epatch API.
# Extra options to pass
