-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| Another useflag-related question.
|
| Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
|
| encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
|
| this is a loose definition which is quite useles
Gregorio Guidi wrote:
>
> ...toolame doesn't seem to do mp3s, so it doesn't overlap with lame.
> (and btw it seems a dead project since two years, who would want it ;)
>
looks like there is yet another fork called twolame[1] that is mantained.
lu
[1]http://twolame.sf.net
--
Luca Barbato
G
On Thursday 12 May 2005 21:22, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 21:20, Gregorio Guidi wrote:
> > Is there a package where this could apply?
>
> We have couple of packages which can use both lame or toolame.
...toolame doesn't seem to do mp3s, so it doesn't overlap with la
On Thursday 12 May 2005 21:20, Gregorio Guidi wrote:
> Is there a package where this could apply?
We have couple of packages which can use both lame or toolame.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
pgpfon0vIe2JM.
On Thursday 12 May 2005 20:55, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > so ? can you show me a package that this difference matters ? if not,
> > then having lame sep from mp3 is pointless ...
>
> It's analog to the lesstif use flag:
>
> lesstif - Use lesstif over openmotif in cases wher
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> so ? can you show me a package that this difference matters ? if not, then
> having lame sep from mp3 is pointless ...
It's analog to the lesstif use flag:
lesstif - Use lesstif over openmotif in cases where a program supports both
lame - Use lame over $OTHER_MP3ENCODI
On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:19 pm, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote:
> On 5/12/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > if you created a USE=lame, it would simply be a subset of USE=mp3
>
> But USE=mp3 could mean mp3 decoding support in audio players, while
> lame is not a decoder.
so ? can
On 5/12/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you created a USE=lame, it would simply be a subset of USE=mp3
But USE=mp3 could mean mp3 decoding support in audio players, while
lame is not a decoder.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 12 May 2005 12:50 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 18:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > lame doesnt produce any other formats than mp3s afaik
>
> But there are other libraries which produce mp3s. Lame is just one of them.
whats your point ?
if you created a U
On Thursday 12 May 2005 18:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> lame doesnt produce any other formats than mp3s afaik
But there are other libraries which produce mp3s. Lame is just one of them.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
http://dev.gentoo.org/~flam
On Thursday 12 May 2005 11:52 am, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>My proposal is to start using lame useflag to enable lame support (in
> >>software which is just encoding on itself),
> >
> > why not re-use the 'mp3' USE flag ?
>
> I guess the focus here wouldn't be on supporting
Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>My proposal is to start using lame useflag to enable lame support (in
>>software which is just encoding on itself),
>
>
> why not re-use the 'mp3' USE flag ?
because LAME Ain't an Mp3 Encoder? ;)
I guess the focus here wouldn't be on supporting mp3-encoding as such
but
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
>Another useflag-related question.
>
>Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
>
>encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
>
>this is a loose definition which is quite useless for medium user, as it's
>used also in a non-c
On Thursday 12 May 2005 05:12 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
>
> this is a loose definition which is quite useless for medium user, as it's
> used also in a non-complete-standard way in all ebuilds.
agreed
> My propos
Another useflag-related question.
Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
this is a loose definition which is quite useless for medium user, as it's
used also in a non-complete-standard way in all ebuilds.
My p
15 matches
Mail list logo
