Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-19 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:34:22PM +0100, yac wrote: > On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:44:09 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:48:44AM +0100, yac wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500 > > > Emery Hemingway wrote: > > > > The default GOROOT that go looks at for base l

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-19 Thread yac
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:44:09 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:48:44AM +0100, yac wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500 > > Emery Hemingway wrote: > > > The default GOROOT that go looks at for base libraries seems to be > > > compiled in so this should be pretty eas

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-15 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:48:44AM +0100, yac wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500 > Emery Hemingway wrote: > > The default GOROOT that go looks at for base libraries seems to be > > compiled in so this should be pretty easy, like python but simplier. > > I'm not sure what you are trying t

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-15 Thread Emery Hemingway
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:13:27 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:02:49AM -0500, Emery Hemingway wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0100 > > Jan Matejka wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 > > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread yac
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500 Emery Hemingway wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0100 > Jan Matejka wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go > > > out for s

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:02:49AM -0500, Emery Hemingway wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0100 > Jan Matejka wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 > > William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go out > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread Emery Hemingway
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0100 Jan Matejka wrote: > On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 > William Hubbs wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go out > > for some reason. > > > > As the primary go maintainer, I do want to be involved in t

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread Jan Matejka
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > Hi all, > > I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go out > for some reason. > > As the primary go maintainer, I do want to be involved in this. :-) > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:38:44AM +0100, yac wrote: > > On

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-13 Thread Emery Hemingway
I made an overlay for Go eclasses and packages: https://github.com/gentoo-golang/overlay If anyone is interested ping 'emery' in #gentoo-dev-help and I'll add you to the github organization. There is an overlay skeleton at master, and a first draft eclass and ebuilds for btcd on another branch. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-13 Thread William Hubbs
Hi all, I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go out for some reason. As the primary go maintainer, I do want to be involved in this. :-) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:38:44AM +0100, yac wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:48:17 -0500 > Emery Hemingway wrote: > > > I really li

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-13 Thread Emery Hemingway
> I think it would be good idea to start a separate gentoo-golang > repository (github?) and treat it more (to keep it aligned with the > way gentoo works) or less (to speed up the development) as if it were > gx86. > > In the organization part, I think we could inspire ourself in the way > gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-10 Thread yac
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:48:17 -0500 Emery Hemingway wrote: > I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of > merging Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else > is interested in a Go project. I might be. I have packaged something for private use but it just a

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2013-12-31 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Emery Hemingway wrote: > I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging > Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is > interested in a Go project. > > > For those who aren't familiar with Go, I will sumarise why Port

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2013-12-30 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/30/2013 03:48 PM, Emery Hemingway wrote: > I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging > Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is > interested in a Go project. > > > For those who aren't famil

[gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2013-12-30 Thread Emery Hemingway
I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is interested in a Go project. For those who aren't familiar with Go, I will sumarise why Portage and Go do not play well together. Go is static linked by default