Re: [gentoo-dev] cygwin prefix patch: request for eyeballs

2012-03-27 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - > > 'if not os.environ["PORTAGE_PYTONPATH"]:' > If PORTAGE_PYTHONPATH is not in os.environ then it will raise a > KeyError, that is why we are doing a contains to begin with. I somehow got the idea that the python gods had sprinkled magical syntax-sugar on bool(x[y])

Re: [gentoo-dev] cygwin prefix patch: request for eyeballs

2012-03-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote: > - Original Message - >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner >> wrote: >> > https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch > >> Consistency in

Re: [gentoo-dev] cygwin prefix patch: request for eyeballs

2012-03-26 Thread Gregory M. Turner
- Original Message - > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner > wrote: > > https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch > Consistency in the style would be nice. > > For instance in cygdll-update: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] cygwin prefix patch: request for eyeballs

2012-03-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote: > Hello, I would appreciate if those of you with portage development experience > and a moment to spare could please take a look at: > > https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygd

[gentoo-dev] cygwin prefix patch: request for eyeballs

2012-03-26 Thread Gregory M. Turner
Hello, I would appreciate if those of you with portage development experience and a moment to spare could please take a look at: https://github.com/gmt/gmt-cygwin-overlay/blob/master/sys-apps/portage/files/portage-2.2.01.20271-cygdll_protect.patch Not gunning for upstream or anything, but I woul