-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and
>> possibly extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary
>> distros do or do we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some
>> pack
Le 4 nov. 2009 à 20:25, Peter Volkov a écrit :
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет:
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
So are there any good reasons to split packages?
In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes.
in case whe
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
> > So are there any good reasons to split packages?
>
> In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes.
Currently you either have to script your staging server
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly
> extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do
> we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split
> other use clien
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly
> extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do
> we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split
> other use client, server or minimal USE flag(s).
>
> Back
Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly
extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do
we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split
other use client, server or minimal USE flag(s).
Back in 2006 similar problem was dis
