On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 21:52 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >
> >>I just picked some package as an example of the output with
> >>openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
> >>libraries,
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 21:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:11, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Unfortunately scanelf also doesn't know (nor can it know)
>
> no utility will be able to passively calculate dependencies that happen via
> dlopen() or any similar dynamic lib
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 11:11, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> Unfortunately scanelf also doesn't know (nor can it know)
no utility will be able to passively calculate dependencies that happen via
dlopen() or any similar dynamic library loading interface
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>I just picked some package as an example of the output with
>>openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
>>libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies
>>don't s
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:26, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
> I just picked some package as an example of the output with
> openoffice-bin. My understanding here is that if you link against those
> libraries, it will break break binary packages because dependencies
> don't say to pull in required li
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
>>This has the side affect that the library location code is not used
>>until I code or take the logic from glibc from example.
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bin $ checkdeps.rb subversion
>>dev-libs/apr
>>dev-libs/apr-util
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 23:12, Petteri Räty wrote:
>
> This has the side affect that the library location code is not used
> until I code or take the logic from glibc from example.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bin $ checkdeps.rb subversion
> dev-libs/apr
> dev-libs/apr-util
> dev-libs/expat
> dev-li
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>
>>Basically it does ldd on all
>>the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
>>libraries belong.
>
>
> ldd is garbage for this purpose
>
> use `readelf -d ELF | grep NEEDED` or just `
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Basically it does ldd on all
> the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
> libraries belong.
ldd is garbage for this purpose
use `readelf -d ELF | grep NEEDED` or just `scanelf -n ELF`
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@g
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:09:08 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically it does ldd on all the elf files in a package and then
> checks to which packages those libraries belong.
I don't think "ldd" alone is the way to go, because it doesn't make
distinction beetween direct and ind
http://dev.gentoo.org/~betelgeuse/scripts/checkdeps.rb
Some people will probably find this useful. Basically it does ldd on all
the elf files in a package and then checks to which packages those
libraries belong. I think portage people are working on integrating
something like this to portage in th
11 matches
Mail list logo
