Re: [gentoo-dev] bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)

2009-03-10 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb: > As one can easily see: While the fetch time for co and lw-co are more or > less equal, the export time is not. As one can say, that each package is > at least exported as often as updated (if not more often), this make

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)

2009-03-10 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have some doubts about the usage of "co --lightweight" instead of the plain "co". The only reason I can see is the reduced disk-space needed. Because concerning time, the lightweight checkouts take (way) longer... Just some bash-time tests done with

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)

2009-03-06 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Perhaps add "> /dev/null" to the pushd/popd calls? To get rid of unnecessary output. - - Necoro -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmxTBcACgkQ4UO

[gentoo-dev] bzr.eclass: The next level (this time with patch)

2009-03-05 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, after the review and more suggestions I would like to post the current version of the patch: * EAPI aware (ulm) * Better documentation * Some clean ups (a lot of people) V-Li -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode http:/