On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 11:54 +0200, Philipp Riegger wrote:
> The current situation:
>
> Binary packages are (usually) stored
> in /usr/portage/packages/$category/$package-$version.tbz2. The package
> consists of the "real binary package" and the metadata (combined using
> xpak or whatever).
No, t
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
> This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over
> Portage =>
> Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and
> apidocs.
> http://gitweb.sabayon.org/?p=entropy.git;a=summary
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage =>
Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out s
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
>>> This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage =>
>>> Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and
>>> apidocs.
>>> http:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage =>
Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and
apidocs.
http://gitweb.sabayon.org/?p=entropy.git;a=summary
Only
lx...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
> This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage =>
> Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and
> apidocs.
> http://gitweb.sabayon.org/?p=entropy.git;a=summary
>
Only problem with entropy is that it doesn't work nice
This is what I am doing in Sabayon, creating a new layer over Portage =>
Entropy. I'm almost done, just need to work out some documentation and apidocs.
http://gitweb.sabayon.org/?p=entropy.git;a=summary
--
Fabio Erculiani
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Good morning,
I want to talk about improved binary package support for Gentoo. About
1-2 months ago there already was a discussion about this on gentoo-soc@
and on bugzilla [1]. If I remember correctly, there were no devs
involved in the discussion, so I thought I'll post my thoughts here.
I know
