On Friday 24 August 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> case "$(declare -p "$1" 2>/dev/null)" in
/me stabs excessive quoting
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 2007-08-24 at 00:33 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
> I mentioned to the vserver list that i was interested to convert the
> scripts to POSIX. First he said that he was not against it until he
> realized he could no longer use arrays.
>
> http://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200708/0025
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 14:17 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:33 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> > > Regarding init scripts.
> > > Init scripts should now be strictly bourne or POSIX shell. ie, no
> > > bashisms. bash init scripts will work, but ONLY if /bin/sh is bash.
> > > Shells as /bin
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:33 +0100, Ed W wrote:
> > Regarding init scripts.
> > Init scripts should now be strictly bourne or POSIX shell. ie, no
> > bashisms. bash init scripts will work, but ONLY if /bin/sh is bash.
> > Shells as /bin/sh that I've tested and found to be working are
> > bash
> > da
Regarding init scripts.
Init scripts should now be strictly bourne or POSIX shell. ie, no
bashisms. bash init scripts will work, but ONLY if /bin/sh is bash.
Shells as /bin/sh that I've tested and found to be working are
bash
dash
busybox
zsh
FreeBSD sh
Also, as there's no bashisms, that also m
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 21:31 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Just an issue I thought a long while ago...
> What about adding USE flags for all optional networking components...
> So that they installed without manually merging them one by one?
Too many use flags - simply install the package.
In the fu
On 7/21/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
though). Arch teams will then be
Roy Marples escribió:
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:30 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
We'll definitely want the same version stable across the board. I'll be
sure to work with Roy and you to ensure we come to an agreement on what
to use and that we're all on the same page.
Fair enough.
Should I o
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 22:24 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:30 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > We'll definitely want the same version stable across the board. I'll be
> > sure to work with Roy and you to ensure we come to an agreement on what
> > to use and that we're all o
On Monday 23 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:30 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > We'll definitely want the same version stable across the board. I'll be
> > sure to work with Roy and you to ensure we come to an agreement on what
> > to use and that we're all on the same
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:30 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> We'll definitely want the same version stable across the board. I'll be
> sure to work with Roy and you to ensure we come to an agreement on what
> to use and that we're all on the same page.
Fair enough.
Should I open a bug (when the
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> >> 5) Do you have a rough estimate (month, 3 weeks, 5 weeks, what?) on when
> >> the first arches might be stabilizing 2.x?
> >
> > No.
> > If the RC's prove stable and no serious regressions are reported for a
> > month then we'll probably
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> 4) What baselayout will be used in the next release? (Maybe that's more
> of a releng question.)
Whichever is stable around September(ish) time frame will be what we
use, unless it is requested that we use something different.
--
Chris Gia
On Saturday 21 July 2007 16:36:03 Roy Marples wrote:
> This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
> plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
> it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
> though). Arch teams w
Roy Marples wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Roy Marples wrote:
I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
they do this.
I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (
Roy Marples wrote:
4) What baselayout will be used in the next release? (Maybe that's more
of a releng question.)
baselayout team just makes baselayout releases. If you mean the LiveCD
then ask releng.
It'll be whatever version of baselayout is stable at the time we take the
initial release
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> Archiving the handbook isn't possible.
>
> Why? Unless I'm missing something, it should be fairly trivial.
It ain't. It's an old issue.
Current networked (requires a net connection to install) handbooks go to
/doc/en/
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:25 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> Archiving the handbook isn't possible.
Why? Unless I'm missing something, it should be fairly trivial.
> What'd really be nice is if it goes stable for all arches (or at least
> all of the ones that matter, subjectively) either in time or a
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
>> (GDP): you give us the info, we'll document it for you. Or I will at least.
>
> Well, the changes are as outlined in my first email.
> The user changes are mainly a few variables in the /etc/conf.d/* files
> that basela
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;)
>
> Let bug #186156 [1] be henceforth known as the sleeky and sexy bug!
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 17:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;)
Let bug #186156 [1] be henceforth known as the sleeky and sexy bug!
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186156
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
About the nscd issue we discussed on irc on friday (i.e. daemon not
playing nice with parallel startup), your patch worked. It stayed on
my work laptop, though, so I can't file a bug right now. But I'll do
so monday morning.
I'll add mine about the dhcdbd patch you gave
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> > > in
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> > installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
> /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
> installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1).
> Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the ma
Hi!
[... baselayout-2 is on the horizon ...]
Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one:
/etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After
installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1).
Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the machine
would have be
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 15:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i really think this bash vs POSIX issue is getting way more emphasis than it
> should. i'd make the claim the majority of people out there dont even know
> about /bin/sh, bash, dash, and friends, so most people out there will
> have /bi
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> >From our perspective, /etc/conf.d/* is quite well documented, so GDP
>
> could easily diff the files to see what has changed.
>
> > Of equal concern to me, however are a few issues:
> >
> > 1) H
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 11:48 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
> (GDP): you give us the info, we'll document it for you. Or I will at least.
Well, the changes are as outlined in my first email.
The user changes are mainly a few variables in the /etc/conf.d/* files
that baselayout ships. For example a few
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:15 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Roy Marples wrote:
>>> This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
>>> plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
>>> it will be removed from package.mask (keeping th
On 7/21/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now there are, as usual, some daemons and init scripts that probably
won't work. For those that don't, I have either fixed or there's patches
in our bugzilla. Here's a rough summary.
About the nscd issue we discussed on irc on friday (i.e. daem
Roy Marples kirjoitti:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> Roy Marples wrote:
>>> I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
>>> would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
>>> they do this.
>> I manage systems with a si
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:45 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
> > would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
> > they do this.
>
> I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (not
Roy Marples wrote:
I don't actually know how to set those up or what the migration path
would be. Maybe devzero and strerror could document this as I understand
they do this.
I manage systems with a single RAID 0 stripe (not dmraid) managed by
device-mapper. When upgrading baselayout, we also
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 12:15 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
> > This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
> > plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
> > it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas maske
Roy Marples wrote:
This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword
basel
This is just a heads up for getting baselayout-2 stable. Next week I
plan to put baselayout-2.0.0_rc1 into the tree without any keywords and
it will be removed from package.mask (keeping the current alphas masked
though). Arch teams will then be pinged on a bug to keyword
baselayout-2.
Now there a
37 matches
Mail list logo
