On 22.5.2012 8.53, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>
>> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
>> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
>> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
>> of nowhere. I don't believe this issue
On 05/22/2012 11:22 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> Maybe they should be checked and a repoman warning should be added when
>>> an ebuild is using epatch without inheriting eutils directly, otherwi
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 12:25 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> >> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> >> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.
On Mon, 21 May 2012 23:16:25 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 06:46 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils,
> > see
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
2012-05-22 01:01:04 Francesco Riosa napisał(a):
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> >> remove eutils
2012/5/21 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> >> Excuse me but the way thi
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:24:27 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> >> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> >> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depr
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
>> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
>> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inhe
On Monday 21 May 2012 19:01:04 Francesco Riosa wrote:
> 2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger:
> > On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> >> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> >> remove e
2012/5/22 Mike Frysinger :
> On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
>> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
>> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
>>
On Monday 21 May 2012 18:16:25 Markos Chandras wrote:
> Excuse me but the way this change was handled is a bit depressing.
> First, the ebuilds should have been fixed to inherit eutils and then
> remove eutils from autotools. Now, a bunch of ebuilds are broken out
> of nowhere. I don't believe this
On 05/21/2012 06:46 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils,
> see
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
>
>
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a
On Monday 21 May 2012 15:04:44 Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.
> > eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.
On 05/21/2012 12:04 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
>> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>>
>> Rely
El lun, 21-05-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
>
> Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs wa
On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134
Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible
idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are
16 matches
Mail list logo
