On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:38:16 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 11:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
> >> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to us
On 05/25/2010 11:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
>> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to users if
>> something goes wrong.
>
> which is irrelevant her
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 16:02:04 Petteri Räty wrote:
> Even if people don't have useful feedback sending the diff enables them
> to prepare for the upcoming changes and provide support to users if
> something goes wrong.
which is irrelevant here because i did notify people of the change
-mike
sig
On 05/25/2010 01:17 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a f
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 15:22:14 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 25/05/2010 09:23, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> >> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
> >> enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
> >> interest and got people to contribute.
> >
> >
Le 25/05/2010 09:23, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
>> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
>> enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
>> interest and got people to contribute.
>
> i'm just asking for proof that it's useful here
And I'm asking
В Пнд, 24/05/2010 в 18:17 -0400, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.97&r2=1.98
for makefile_name in {GNUmakefile,{M,m}akefile}.{am,in} "" ; do
Why "" is required at the end of file list?
--
Peter.
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 02:54:27 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 25/05/2010 00:17, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> > so prove me wrong and post some useful feedback on the change. i'm
> > simply being realistic.
>
> Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
> enough projects where
Le 25/05/2010 00:17, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> so prove me wrong and post some useful feedback on the change. i'm
> simply being realistic.
Even if you think no one will ever comment on your patches, I've seen
enough projects where posting patches and doing reviews generated
interest and got peo
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
this doesnt brea
On 24.5.2010 23.51, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
>>> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
>> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
>>
>> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake
On 24.5.2010 1.54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
> this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
>
> if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake failure, try backing out the
> autotools.eclass change f
ive updated eautomake to run automake in a few more edge cases. hopefully
this doesnt break anything else (seems to not on my system), but who knows.
if you see random eautoreconf/eautomake failure, try backing out the
autotools.eclass change first.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a
14 matches
Mail list logo